NJ Professionals
New Jersey Divorce Lawyers
New Jersey Collaborative Divorce Lawyers New Jersey Military Divorce Professionals New Jersey Divorce Mediators New Jersey Financial Professionals New Jersey Child Custody Experts New Jersey Pension & QDRO Experts New Jersey Private Investigators New Jersey Real Estate Professionals New Jersey Mortgage & Lending Professionals New Jersey Divorce Coaches New Jersey Mental Health Professionals New Jersey Legal Document Assistants New Jersey Appraisers Paternity Testing Experts in New Jersey Other Professionals in New Jersey Zip Code Search |
Grandparent Visitation Rights
New Jersey’s Grandparents’ Visitation Statute, N.J.S.A. 9:27.1, allows a grandparent residing in New Jersey to make an application for visitation. The grandparent must prove that visitation is in the best interests of the child. In making this determination, the court must consider eight factors, including: b. The relationship between the parents and the grandparents; c. The time that has elapsed since the child last saw the d. The effect that such visitation will have on the relationship between the child and the child’s parents; e. If the parents are divorced or separated, the time sharing arrangements that exist between the parents with regard to the child; f. The good faith of the grandparent filing the application; g. Any history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse or neglect by the party making application; and h. Any other factor relevant to the best interest of the child. 2. How can I enforce my rights to have visitations with my grandchildren? If the case is sent to mediation, it will be heard in approximately 30 to 60 days. The mediator is usually a member of the probation department. Lawyers usually are not permitted to attend the mediation session. If the mediation is not successful, the case will be sent back to the family court for a disposition. 3. What are the arguments for grandparent visitation rights? 4. What are the arguments against grandparent visitation rights?
When a judge decides a case, it is on the basis of evidence that is formally presented to the court. Evidence consists of things, such as records and other documents, and testimony from witnesses you call to testify for you. A grandparent will have to prove that it is in the best interests of the child. To show best interest, you will need to address the following factors: a. The love, affection, and other emotional ties that exist between the child and the grandparent; b. The length and quality of the prior relationship between the child and the grandparent; c. The role performed by the grandparent; d. The grandparent’s moral fitness; e. The grandparent’s mental and physical health; f. The child’s reasonable preference; g. The willing of the grandparent to encourage a close relationship between the child and the parent; h. The effect of the child of hostility between the parent and the grandparent; i. Any history of physical, emotional or sexual abuse or neglect of any child by the grandparent; j. Whether the parent’s decision to deny visitation is reasonable; k. Any other factor relevant to the physical or psychological well-being of the child. Other sources of proof include testimony from friends, neighbors, fellow child members, or members of clubs to which you belong. You will also need to show that visitation is in your grandchild’s best interest. Photographs and videotapes showing you having fun with your grandchild are a good way to help you establish the nature of your relationship. Other adults who have seen you spend quality time with your grandchild make good witnesses for this purpose. You may also want to have a psychologist or a therapist to testify about the importance of your grandchildren having a relationship with you.
It is not uncommon for a nasty custody battle to arise between the natural parent and the grandparents if the custodial parent should die. In the case of Watkins v. Nelson, 163 N.J. 235 (2000), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that disputes should be settled in favor of the natural parent unless the third party is a “psychologically parent,” a biological parent is unfit, or if exceptional circumstances exist. There is a presumption of custody in favor of the parent. In the Watkins case, the father began seeking custody shortly after the mother died in a car accident twelve days father giving birth. The grandparents never alleged that the father was unfit parent, but only that they had become psychological parents to the child, who had been living with them since the mother’s death. A crucial issue decided by the Supreme Court was the standard to be applied, the best interest of the child test versus the stand of termination of parental rights. The court ruled that upon the death of the custodial parent, in an action for guardianship of a child, a presumption exists tin favor of the surviving biological parent. The presumption can be rebutted by proof of gross misconduct, abandonment, unfitness, or the existence of exceptional circumstances, but not by the simple application of the best interest test.
Last modified: Dec 28, 2006 02:20 PM
|
|
