Property and Debt Allocation in Minnesota Divorce (Footnotes)
|
By Eric C. Nelson, Attorney at Law
Published: July 17, 2004 |
1 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
2 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivision 1.
3 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
4 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivision 2.
5 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
6 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5(c).
7 Gottsacker v. Gottsacker, 664 N.W.2d 848, 854 (Minn. 2003).
8 Campion v. Campion, 385 N.W.2d 1 (Minn.Ct.App. 1986).
9 Nardini v. Nardini, 414 N.W.2d 184 (Minn. 1987).
10 Swick v. Swick, 467 N.W.2d 328 (Minn.Ct.App. 1991).
11 Swick v. Swick, 467 N.W.2d 328 (Minn.Ct.App. 1991).
12 See Gottsacker v. Gottsacker, 664 N.W.2d 848, 854 (Minn. 2003) (use of marital funds to pay taxes on undistributed Subchapter S corporate income did not create a marital interest).
13 Schmitz v. Schmitz, 309 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1981).
14 Antone v. Antone, 645 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. 2002).
15 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivisio
16 Id.
17 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5(a).
18 Linderman v. Linderman, 364 N.W.2d 872, 877 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985) [engagement ring and wedding band are recipients’ pre-marital property per 518.54, Subd. 5(b)(1984)].
19 Servin v. Servin, 345 N.W.2d 754 (Minn. 1984).
20 See Dahlberg v. Dahlberg, 358 N.W.2d 76 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) (entire marital debt apportioned to husband because he incurred most of it without consulting Wife); and Bliss v. Bliss, 493 N.W.2d 583 (Minn.Ct.App. 1992) (certain debts apportioned solely to wife, where wife failed to disclose the purpose of the debts).