Skip to content.

DivorceNet

You are here: Home » States » Minnesota » Property and Debt Allocation in Minnesota Divorce (Footnotes)

Property and Debt Allocation in Minnesota Divorce (Footnotes)

Document Actions
By Eric C. Nelson, Attorney at Law

Published:  July 17, 2004

1 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
2 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivision 1.
3 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
4 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivision 2.
5 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5.
6 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5(c).
7 Gottsacker v. Gottsacker, 664 N.W.2d 848, 854 (Minn. 2003).
8 Campion v. Campion, 385 N.W.2d 1 (Minn.Ct.App. 1986).
9 Nardini v. Nardini, 414 N.W.2d 184 (Minn. 1987).
10 Swick v. Swick, 467 N.W.2d 328 (Minn.Ct.App. 1991).
11 Swick v. Swick, 467 N.W.2d 328 (Minn.Ct.App. 1991).
12 See Gottsacker v. Gottsacker, 664 N.W.2d 848, 854 (Minn. 2003) (use of marital funds to pay taxes on undistributed Subchapter S corporate income did not create a marital interest).
13 Schmitz v. Schmitz, 309 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1981).
14 Antone v. Antone, 645 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. 2002).
15 Minnesota Statute section 518.58, Subdivisio
16 Id.
17 Minnesota Statute section 518.54, Subdivision 5(a).
18 Linderman v. Linderman, 364 N.W.2d 872, 877 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985) [engagement ring and wedding band are recipients’ pre-marital property per 518.54, Subd. 5(b)(1984)].
19 Servin v. Servin, 345 N.W.2d 754 (Minn. 1984).
20 See Dahlberg v. Dahlberg, 358 N.W.2d 76 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) (entire marital debt apportioned to husband because he incurred most of it without consulting Wife); and Bliss v. Bliss, 493 N.W.2d 583 (Minn.Ct.App. 1992) (certain debts apportioned solely to wife, where wife failed to disclose the purpose of the debts).

Last modified:  January 14, 2005 - 07:57 AM


Divorcenet.com Member View author's page Send this article to somebody Send this article Print this article Print this article