The end of a marriage can be stressful enough on its own. But if you also happen to be pregnant when facing divorce, you'll have extra legal and practical issues to deal with. Can you even get divorced while you (or your spouse) is pregnant? How will it affect the process and outcome of your divorce—especially when it comes to issues like custody and support for your future child? What if there's some question about whether the mother's spouse is actually the baby's parent? There may not be easy answers to all of these questions, but it helps to know what the law actually says—or doesn't say—about divorce and pregnancy.
It shouldn't be surprising to learn that there's a lot of misinformation online about pregnancy and divorce. You may have read that the laws in some states ban divorce during pregnancy. Not true. No states have laws that prohibit getting a divorce when one spouse is pregnant.
In practice, however, pregnancy might mean that it will take longer to get your divorce, depending on where you live and the specific circumstances—and maybe even which judge is assigned to your case. For example:
In the context of divorce or other custody battles between parents, judges generally may not issue orders concerning the custody and support of a child who isn't born yet. There are practical and legal reasons for this. For one thing, judges and parents usually can't know before the birth if the baby will have special needs, which could affect parenting arrangements and medical expenses.
Also, under the law in almost all states known as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), state courts generally have the legal authority (jurisdiction, in legalese) to issue custody orders for children who have lived in that state with a parent for at least six months just before the beginning of the divorce or other custody case—or, if the child is younger than six months old, since the child was born.
Court cases involving this provision in the UCCJEA usually center on disputes over which state's courts can decide on a child's custody—for instance, when a pregnant mother moves to a different state after the couple has separated. But when courts have directly examined whether a judge has the legal authority to issue custody orders before a child is born, they've mostly concluded that the answer is no. (See, for example, Tex. Fam. Code §§ 152.102(7), 152.201(a)(1) (2024); Waltenburg v. Waltenburg, 270 S.W.3d 308 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).)
However, it's worth pointing out that the so-called fetal personhood movement—the political and legal push to treat fetuses and embryos (even frozen embryos) as full human beings—could conceivably affect the question of whether judges can issue legal custody orders in a divorce proceeding before the baby's birth. And in a different context—when a pregnant woman is accused of endangering her fetus—many courts have long had the authority to issue orders affecting custody before a child is born. (See, for example, N.J. Stat. § 30:4C-11 (2024).)
If there's a question about whether a pregnant woman's husband is the baby's father, that might delay the final divorce—depending, once again, on the circumstances and state laws.
When a married woman has a child or gets pregnant, state laws presume that her spouse is the baby's parent. The details vary from state to state, but this paternity presumption—sometimes called a parenthood or marital presumption—usually applies when the child was conceived during the marriage or was born within the typical gestational period after the marriage ended. Courts in several states have held that the parenthood presumption also applies to the wife of a woman who had a child during the marriage using assisted reproduction.
Typically, the husband or another man may try to "rebut" (overcome) the parenthood presumption by filing a legal proceeding to establish (or "disestablish") paternity or parentage. In some states, judges won't issue a final divorce until these disputes are resolved. Although it's usually possible to get a prenatal paternity test, that won't always solve the problem. Under Texas law, for instance, a parentage action that started while the mother was still pregnant may not be concluded until after the child is born. (Tex. Fam. Code § 160.611 (2024).)
Judges have different ways of dealing with the hurdles involved in divorce while a spouse is pregnant. The choice between these options can depend on state law, the favored practice in certain courts, or the specifics of the couple's circumstances.
In several states, judges have the option of granting a divorce while maintaining the legal authority ("jurisdiction," in legalese) to rule later on some of the issues that weren't dealt with in the divorce judgment. This is known as a reservation of jurisdiction or a "bifurcated" divorce—meaning that the status of a couple's marriage is handled separately from the other issues that must be addressed in a divorce. In some states, the laws specifically allow a bifurcated divorce, at least in some circumstances. In other states, courts have endorsed the practice. But even when it's allowed in a state, it will generally be up to the judge to decide whether to grant a request to finalize your divorce with a reservation of jurisdiction—unless you and your spouse agree on the request.
If you've received a "status-only" divorce while you're still pregnant, or a divorce judgment that addressed only some issues (like property division), you'll need to come back to court after the child is born to get orders addressing child support, custody, and any other issues that weren't already resolved. If you and your ex can reach an agreement on those issues, you'll still have to submit your agreement to the court so that a judge can review it and—if it's in the child's best interests—make it part of an official court order.
Unless it's prohibited under state law (as discussed above), judges or couples often decide that it's more efficient to delay the final divorce until the child is born. That way, the divorce decree or judgment can include all of the necessary custody and child support orders, and the parents and judge don't have to revisit those issues in subsequent court proceedings.
Some courts have established a strong preference for this option. For instance, the Indiana Supreme Court has advised that when there's an unresolved paternity dispute, it's "better practice" to delay the final divorce while the wife is pregnant rather than grant the divorce with a reservation of jurisdiction, "unless circumstances dictate otherwise." (L.F.R. v. R.A.R.,378 N.E.2d 855 (Ind. 1978).)
It may seem counterintuitive that a pregnant woman would be in a hurry to get a final divorce. Even in troubled marriages, pregnancy often brings couples closer together—if only temporarily. But that's not always the case. And pregnant women may have good reasons for wanting a divorce as quickly as possible, such as:
As should be clear by now, pregnancy can complicate the divorce process. When you're facing the end of your marriage while you or your spouse is pregnant, you should at least speak with a lawyer. An experienced, local family law attorney can explain how the laws in your state and the court practices in your area are likely to affect your case. A lawyer can also help you get temporary orders to deal with pregnancy-related issues during the divorce.
In the meantime, you and your spouse can start trying to agree on a parenting plan (either on your own, through mediation, or with the help of your lawyers). Even if a judge won't make your agreement part of an official court order until after the birth, it can speed things up when you've worked out the details ahead of time. Also, if you expect a custody dispute down the line, this is the time for fathers (or same-sex spouses who aren't the pregnant one) to establish their commitment to parenting—such as by contributing to prenatal expenses and accompanying the mother to doctor's appointments—which could affect the judge's later custody decisions.